[NeXus-committee] Vote on NXpinhole and NXslit

[Benjamin Watts]

Hi,
    Aren't the proposed classes effectively the same as an NXaperture 
that describes the size of the "hole", as is allowed in the definition? 
I don't see any need for the proposed classes, but I'll give Eugen a 
chance to explain before I vote against it.

Cheers,
Ben


On 02/05/14 17:57, Tobias.Richter at diamond.ac.uk wrote:
>
> Led by Eugen Wintersberger (DESY) the community has developed two base 
> classes for common simple geometry components (slits and pinholes). 
> The current definitions only foresee the general purpose class 
> NXaperture which requires a nested NXgeometry. The full (short) 
> proposal is available on the wiki: 
> http://wiki.nexusformat.org/NXaperture_and_Slits 
> <http://wiki.nexusformat.org/NXaperture_and_Slits> It was felt by the 
> technical subcommittee that we should vote on this now.
>
> Please reply to this email stating support or rejection for NXslit and 
> NXpinhole either by filling in the ballot below or using equivalent 
> wording. Both public and private replies are counted (one vote per 
> member only).
>
> Deadline shall be Monday 19^th May noon UK summer time (two weeks from 
> now + grace period).
>
> [  ] I support the proposed NXslit and NXpinhole base class 
> definitions as documented on the above wiki page (version from 
> 20140417-1008) <YES>
>
> [  ] I reject the proposal in the current state <NO>
>
> [  ] I abstain <ABSTAIN>
>
> Reminder: Those eligible to vote will find their name on this page 
> http://wiki.nexusformat.org/Membership_Dates under a heading with a 
> date in the future.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Tobias
>
> NIAC Executive Secretary
>
>
> -- 
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright 
> and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended 
> addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised 
> recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning 
> the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the 
> information in or attached to the e-mail.
> Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual 
> and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd.
> Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any 
> attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for 
> any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which 
> may be transmitted in or with the message.
> Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in 
> England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell 
> Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United 
> Kingdom
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NeXus-committee mailing list
> NeXus-committee at nexusformat.org
> http://lists.nexusformat.org/mailman/listinfo/nexus-committee

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nexusformat.org/pipermail/nexus-committee/attachments/20140505/ce781711/attachment.html>