[NeXus-committee] publication, yet another variant

[Koennecke Mark (PSI)]

Pete and all,

I have pushed this now onto github into branch mk

Pete, I already fixed the little type you found.

Joachim: I changed the abstract a little so that is reads data exchange and archival format. I think we never discussed this difference 
in any length. But I fail to see why NeXus cannot serve both use cases or why there is a conflict between archival and exchange formats. 
Well, you may want to put less data into an exchange format, may be. 

In order to find a conclusion on the journal in which to publich I suggest a little survey. IMHO we do not need to get to formal about this;
the choice of journal does not change NeXus in the least bit.  Please indicate your preference till the next Telco, October 16

[] RSI, which may not accept us
[] JAC, Journal of Applied Crystallograpy
[] NIM-A

Best Regards,

     Mark




Am 08.10.2014 um 17:16 schrieb Pete Jemian <prjemian at gmail.com>:

> is this checked into GitHub?
> 
> There's a typo to be corrected, not worth mailing to all collaborators and provoking interesting diversionary comments.
> 
> In II. General Principles, paragraph two, last sentence, change:
> ---: minium
> +++: minimum
> 
> 
> On 10/8/2014 8:01 AM, Koennecke Mark (PSI) wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I looked at the start  of our joint application again. Ray  was right that the Design Principles
>> section was shot in a way. IMHO, it was obfuscated by material which really belongs into
>> the introduction. What I did now was to rearrange the material a little. Now there is a more
>> complete introduction followed by shorter General Principles section.
>> 
>> Let me know what you think,
>> 
>> 
>> Mark
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NeXus-committee mailing list
>> NeXus-committee at nexusformat.org
>> http://lists.nexusformat.org/mailman/listinfo/nexus-committee
>>