[NeXus-committee] NXgroup: undocumented or inofficial?

[Wintersberger, Eugen]

Hi all

On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 11:02 -0500, Pete Jemian wrote:
> Joachim :
> 
> The text "NXgroup" does not appear in the manual, nor in any NXDL 
> definition.

Have not found any reference neither. 

> 
> 
> The SNS should be advised to change this use of NXgroup to one of the 
> existing NeXus base classes.  The SNS data files with NXgroup groups 
> should not be considered as examples of fully-compliant NeXus data files.

Complete agreement. 

regards 
  Eugen

> 
> Pete
> 
> 
> 
> On 7/8/2014 10:33 AM, Joachim Wuttke wrote:
> >  From a SNS sample file, I learn that there is
> > a NeXus class "NXgroup". However, I do not find
> > it in the PDF doc, release 3.1.
> > Is this a bug in the doc, or is NXgroup an
> > unofficial extension?
> > - Joachim
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NeXus-committee mailing list
> > NeXus-committee at nexusformat.org
> > http://lists.nexusformat.org/mailman/listinfo/nexus-committee
> >
> _______________________________________________
> NeXus-committee mailing list
> NeXus-committee at nexusformat.org
> http://lists.nexusformat.org/mailman/listinfo/nexus-committee

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.nexusformat.org/pipermail/nexus-committee/attachments/20140709/f091b4e9/attachment.sig>