[NeXus-committee] NXroot is required - or should be made so
Joachim Wuttke
j.wuttke at fz-juelich.de
Thu Aug 28 16:50:24 BST 2014
Again the same problem:
We cannot evolve forward unless we find a satisfactory way
to deal with backward compatibility.
Shouldn't the manuscript describe best practice as of now,
regardless of compatibility issues?
On 08/28/2014 05:24 PM, Pete Jemian wrote:
> Not required (backwards compatibility) but strongly suggested form this
> point forward.
>
> On 8/28/2014 10:15 AM, Joachim Wuttke wrote:
>> If we let Figs 1-3 as they are, we'll tie down
>> that NXroot is not required.
>> Does that make sense?
>> Shouldn't we rather correct NXroot.xml?
> _______________________________________________
> NeXus-committee mailing list
> NeXus-committee at nexusformat.org
> http://lists.nexusformat.org/mailman/listinfo/nexus-committee
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5013 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.nexusformat.org/pipermail/nexus-committee/attachments/20140828/84d6fe23/attachment.p7s>
More information about the NeXus-committee
mailing list