[NeXus-tech] [NeXusDefinitions] #25: Review: NXfermi_chopper

[Pete Jemian]

Now this goes to a global question:
Do we want/need to have a units attribute for any "field" declaration
with a "type" that is a member of NX_NUMBER?
If so, then we satisfy this part of the ticket (but use NX_UNITLESS 
instead). 
Plus we change all other NXDL similarly.

NX_DIMENSIONLESS
    for fields where the units cancel out, example: "" or mm/mm
NX_UNITLESS
    for fields that don't have a unit (e.g. hkl) so that they don't 
inherit the wrong units


NeXus Base Classes and Instrument Definitions wrote:
> #25: Review: NXfermi_chopper
> ----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
> Reporter:  Stuart Campbell  |        Owner:     
>     Type:  defect           |       Status:  new
> Priority:  major            |   Resolution:     
> Keywords:                   |  
> ----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
> Old description:
>
>   
>> * Rename "num" to "number".[[BR]]
>> * Rename NX_DIMENSIONLESS to "number" field.
>>     
>
> New description:
>
>  * Rename "num" to "number".[[BR]]
>  * Add NX_DIMENSIONLESS units to "number" field.
>
>   

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------
  Pete R. Jemian, Ph.D.                <jemian at anl.gov>
  Beam line Controls and Data Acquisition, Group Leader
  Advanced Photon Source,   Argonne National Laboratory
  Argonne, IL  60439                   630 - 252 - 3189
-----------------------------------------------------------
     Education is the one thing for which people
        are willing to pay yet not receive.
-----------------------------------------------------------