[NeXus-tech] NXgeometry

[Pete Jemian]

Turns out it is _only_ a conceptual problem for me and not a lexical 
problem.  And I'm over it now.
The XSLT does not need the other base classes when translating an NXDL 
into an XSD.
(It will generate some include statements that call the base classes 
identified in the NXDL group elements.)
Conclusion, tempest in a teapot.

Akeroyd, FA (Freddie) wrote:
> I see no problem with NXgeometry occurring more than once in a group -
> you may want to refer to the geometry of something else rather than the
> object itself (can't think of an example just now though). The instance
> of NXgeometry that refers to the class itself should be called
> "geometry" though as that makes it easy to identify, inherit and also
> allows the linking mentioned below.
>
> NXtranslation referring to NXgeometry seems to be OK - the Oxygen schema
> parser hasn't thrown it out anyway, but I haven't yet tried to validate
> anything against it.
>
> Freddie
>   

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------
  Pete R. Jemian, Ph.D.                <jemian at anl.gov>
  Beam line Controls and Data Acquisition, Group Leader
  Advanced Photon Source,   Argonne National Laboratory
  Argonne, IL  60439                   630 - 252 - 3189
-----------------------------------------------------------
     Education is the one thing for which people
        are willing to pay yet not receive.
-----------------------------------------------------------