[NeXus-tech] NXmonopd

[Pete Jemian]

Great that you added an application def.  The problem that I saw was 
that the <doc> elements were not valid(not recognized as part of NXDL's 
namespace)  since they should have been nx:doc elements instead.

For consistency, I removed all the nx: prefixes and made the xmlns:ns 
into xmlns (the default namespace).

To help identify which NXDL was parsed for the documentation in DocBook 
and the XML Schema rules, I added the SVN ID as an attribute.

And, I added the svn:keywords property to the SVN repo for this file.

With this application, we can test and strengthen more rules in building 
the XML Schema and DocBook components.

Pete



Mark Koennecke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my first attempt on NXDL is the port of the ratified monochromatic 
> powder diffraction application definition.
> Can someone of the XML-gurus please have a look at it so that I know if 
> I messed it up before I endeavour
> to start at others.  There is one thing  which bothers me:  I used the 
> eclipse-XML editor to assist me in this.
> This caused name space qualifiers like nx:field to appear in the file. 
> At least I think the nx: is a namespace
> qualifier. But all the base classes come without this qualifier. I do 
> not think it matters; both should be valid.
> But is there an official line how to handle this? Or do we need a rule?
>
>    Best Regards,
>
>           Mark 
> _______________________________________________
> NeXus-tech mailing list
> NeXus-tech at nexusformat.org
> http://lists.nexusformat.org/mailman/listinfo/nexus-tech
>