[NeXus-tech] transition to GIT for definitions and documentation

[Wintersberger, Eugen]

On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 09:37 -0400, Campbell, Stuart I. wrote:
> I vote we move to github! :-)

How good is the GIT integration with the issue-tracker on github? I can
remember when I moved away from sourceforge I have chosen GoogleCode as
a new home for my projects as the issue tracker integration was not as
good on github. Does this work now?

If this issue has been solved - I already have a github account ;)

> 
> On 9/3/13 9:28 AM, "freddie.akeroyd at stfc.ac.uk"
> <freddie.akeroyd at stfc.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> >I'm happy for NeXus code+docs to move to git (and github) is there is a
> >consensus of opinion - I'm relatively new to git myself at the moment,
> >but it is something I need to learn anyway. Should we just have a  vote
> >on nexus-tech ?  
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Freddie
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: nexus-tech-bounces at nexusformat.org [mailto:nexus-tech-
> >> bounces at nexusformat.org] On Behalf Of Campbell, Stuart I.
> >> Sent: 03 September 2013 13:33
> >> To: NeXus Technical sub-committee list
> >> Subject: Re: [NeXus-tech] transition to GIT for definitions and
> >> documentation
> >> 
> >> Hi Eugen,
> >> 
> >> The technical details of transferring are trivial, you could always use
> >> git-svn if you want to use git locally.
> >> 
> >> But, this raises a potential bigger question, if we were to move to git,
> >> why not consider moving wholesale to something like github ?  We could
> >> move from trac to github issues (I've been playing with migrating
> >>tickets
> >> for a different project).
> >> 
> >> It feels like there is a critical mass of companies and projects that
> >>are
> >> hosted on github - maybe we should be ? :-)
> >> 
> >> Cheers
> >> Stu
> >> 
> >> On 9/3/13 8:06 AM, "Wintersberger, Eugen"
> >> <eugen.wintersberger at desy.de>
> >> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >Hi folks
> >> >  I was just wondering if it would be possible to migrate the
> >>repository
> >> >holding the definitions and the documentation from SVN to GIT.
> >> >I tried to work with the SVN repository several times, however,
> >> >branching is a pain with SVN. Besides, GIT could be used offline which
> >> >is quite comfortable when working while traveling by train ;).
> >> >I do not know how difficult it would be to make the transition to GIT
> >> >(at least the current version of Trac works with GIT).
> >> >What is your opinion about moving to GIT?
> >> >
> >> >regards
> >> >  Eugen
> >> 
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> NeXus-tech mailing list
> >> NeXus-tech at nexusformat.org
> >> http://lists.nexusformat.org/mailman/listinfo/nexus-tech
> >-- 
> >Scanned by iCritical.
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >NeXus-tech mailing list
> >NeXus-tech at nexusformat.org
> >http://lists.nexusformat.org/mailman/listinfo/nexus-tech
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NeXus-tech mailing list
> NeXus-tech at nexusformat.org
> http://lists.nexusformat.org/mailman/listinfo/nexus-tech

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.nexusformat.org/mailman/private/nexus-tech/attachments/20130903/2bda5b4c/attachment.sig>