[Nexus] proposed additions to NXdata for non-linear scaling - to aid cbf interoperability

[Wintersberger, Eugen]

Hi all,

On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 15:50 +0100, Benjamin Watts wrote:
> Hi All,
>     Perhaps let's take a quick look at what would be required to 
> implement and support an NXformula class. The 2010 NIAC minutes mention 
> "muParser" 
> (http://muparser.beltoforion.de/mup_features.html#idFeatureOverview) for 
> the syntax and it could be used to cover high-performance needs in C++, 
> C and C#. 

That is a really interesting project - was not aware of this. 

> I expect we should also support implementations in Python and 
> Java (at least), which should be doable for the short list of muParser 
> built-in functions and telling people needing high performance to use 
> muParser instead.

Well -  I am not so sure if this is really that easy. I guess you would
provide a binding via the Python C-API and JNI. Both are not as easy to
handle as their documentation suggests. 

In fact I thought that NAPI is in maintenance mode and no new features
will be implemented (I think this decision was made on the NIAC meeting
in 2012). Who would write the code?

> 
> I would propose that NXformula be implemented as a group containing:
> * A field named "formula" containing a string representing the formula.
> * Links with names corresponding to the parameters of the formula and 
> pointing to the appropriate datasets.
> 
> E.g.
> Scaling:NXformula
>    formula="A*sin(B)+C/3.5"
>    A:NXlink -> /entry1/counter0/data
>    B:NXlink -> /entry1/sample/rotation_angle
>    C:NXlink -> /entry1/counter1/data
> 
> 
> Does this sound like a "good" way to do it?

Despite my concerns mentioned above this sounds absolutely fine for me.
One maybe needs an additional attribute to the data field of NXdetector
providing a path to the NXformula instance storing the transformation
'code'. 

regards
  Eugen

> 
> Cheers,
> Ben
> 
> 
> On 19/02/14 14:28, Mark Koennecke wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > On 02/19/2014 11:15 AM, Wintersberger, Eugen wrote:
> >> Hi folks
> >>
> >> On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 10:11 +0100, Benjamin Watts wrote:
> >>> Hi Jonathan,
> >>>      This kind of thing has been discussed at previous NIAC meetings.
> >>> Your proposal makes for a simple change, but does more to push the
> >>> problem further away from yourself than to actually solve it.
> >> If I understand Ben correctly what he means is that the code working
> >> with the stored data needs to do a lot of work to interpret it
> >> correctly.
> >>
> >>> What we
> >>> really need is some "standard" way to present mathematical formulae in
> >>> general that is accessible across different programming languages.
> >> That's the right way to go.
> >>
> >>> I
> >>> think maybe Eugen Wintersberger had a good suggestion, but I don't
> >>> recall any follow-up on it.
> >> Hm - I cannot recall that I made a good suggestion on this. However,
> >> what I would mot probably do is to use Python syntax to represent math.
> >> This has two advantages:
> >>
> >> 1.) an actual language can immediately execute the code
> >> 2.) it might be easy to write a parser for Python code in any other
> >> language.
> >>
> >> In my opinion 2. is the the critical point. Once you start with this you
> >> are basically inventing a new scripting language. Consequently, a
> >> program which wants to use the data needs to parse this code and takes
> >> the appropriate action which is not a trivial task.
> >>
> >> In addition one should be very careful with such things to not open
> >> Pandoras box. I would restrict this to plain math (no loops, no
> >> branching, etc.). Otherwise you really invent a new language.
> >>
> >> What is still open is how to fill the namespace for the code to execute.
> >> Where should all the data mentioned in
> >>
> >> offset  + data**c
> >>
> >> come from?
> >>
> >> At the end of the day there is one question we should seriously discuss:
> >> how far do we want to go with math in Nexus?
> > This is exactly the point why we never got down to anything in this.
> > In 2011, Amando was tasked to make a proposal but nothing ever
> > came from it. With the manpower and support we do not have, we
> > cannot support our own data interpreter, cross platform and good
> > performance wise.
> >
> > IMHO, the wisest solution seems to be to add what is
> > absolutely required. Required in the sense to cover the use case where
> > you do not have the time to do the conversion on the fly before
> > writing the data to disk.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >             Mark
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> regards
> >>    Eugen
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> NeXus mailing list
> >> NeXus at nexusformat.org
> >> http://lists.nexusformat.org/mailman/listinfo/nexus
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NeXus mailing list
> > NeXus at nexusformat.org
> > http://lists.nexusformat.org/mailman/listinfo/nexus
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NeXus mailing list
> NeXus at nexusformat.org
> http://lists.nexusformat.org/mailman/listinfo/nexus

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.nexusformat.org/pipermail/nexus/attachments/20140219/9788643a/attachment.sig>