[Nexus] NeXus at your facility / NIAC meeting

[steve.collins at diamond.ac.uk]

Thanks Tobias,


I'm interested in several aspects. Perhaps most importantly, formalization of minimum information required for specific automated workflows to function. The NeXus manual describes Application Definitions for this purpose. These are used in a few key areas but uptake is low. I am keen to either have a strong statement of long-term commitment to Application Definitions, or agreed commitment to an alternative.


Also interested in NeXus classes for derived data and their interaction with databases etc (tackling the 'Findability' aspect of FAIR).


And possibly formalization of NeXus terms in an ontology.


Is this the kind of stuff that might be discussed?


Cheers,

Steve


________________________________
From: NeXus <nexus-bounces at shadow.nd.rl.ac.uk> on behalf of Tobias Richter <Tobias.Richter at esss.se>
Sent: 17 September 2018 08:43
To: Discussion forum for the NeXus data format
Subject: Re: [Nexus] NeXus at your facility / NIAC meeting

Hi Steve,

This sounds sensible. I'll leave it to you guys to come up with the right text for Diamond on the facility page.

Domain experts are welcome at the NIAC. Mark B can inform you about the traditional entertainment value of the event and can tell you about what's going to be on the agenda. Maybe there are specific topics you want to propose for your benefit? Then you can decide whether it makes sense for you to join. I'm obviously always happy to see you!

Cheers,
Tobias


On 16/09/2018, 10:41, "NeXus on behalf of steve.collins at diamond.ac.uk" <nexus-bounces at shadow.nd.rl.ac.uk on behalf of steve.collins at diamond.ac.uk> wrote:

    Hi Tobias et al,


    We reviewed this at Diamond last year and plan to do so again in the coming weeks. We have three levels of adoption: (1) writing hdf5 files that vaguely adhere to the NeXus structure, (2) writing validated NeXus files and (3) taking full advantage of the rich features of NeXus for automatic work-flows. Most of our beamline are in category (1) but this is very much work in progress.


    Mark Basham is on the NIAC. I am also interested in participating although more from a scientific than technical aspect. Would this make sense?


    Steve Collins (Diamond Light Source)




    ________________________________
    From: NeXus <nexus-bounces at shadow.nd.rl.ac.uk> on behalf of Tobias Richter <Tobias.Richter at esss.se>
    Sent: 15 September 2018 19:07
    To: nexus at nexusformat.org
    Cc: Zdenek Matej
    Subject: [Nexus] NeXus at your facility / NIAC meeting

    Dear all,

    It would be nice to know the status of NeXus adoption at your facility.

    The page we have for this on the NeXus web page is getting tremendously outdated: https://www.nexusformat.org/Facilities.html
    An update via email to me or a simple pull request page can fix this for your facility (new entries obviously welcome as well): https://github.com/nexusformat/wiki/blob/master/content/Facilities.md

    The idea is not just to collect glowing success stories. We have a NeXus Committee meeting coming up and can put any stumbling blocks in your adoption of NeXus on the agenda: https://www.nexusformat.org/NIAC2018.html

    If your facility is not (yet) represented in the NIAC, please get in touch. The process for joining is simple enough: https://www.nexusformat.org/NIAC.html

    Best wishes,
    Tobias
    (outgoing chair of NIAC)

    --
    European Spallation Source, Lund, Sweden


    _______________________________________________
    NeXus mailing list
    NeXus at nexusformat.org
    http://lists.nexusformat.org/mailman/listinfo/nexus

    _______________________________________________
    NeXus mailing list
    NeXus at nexusformat.org
    http://lists.nexusformat.org/mailman/listinfo/nexus



_______________________________________________
NeXus mailing list
NeXus at nexusformat.org
http://lists.nexusformat.org/mailman/listinfo/nexus