[NeXus-committee] Paper comparison

[Herbert J. Bernstein]

Personally, I find Mark's version more appropriate to a journal article.  Ray's
information is useful to a small audience, but not likely to be of interest
to a general journal readership either for RSI or J. Appl. Cryst or NIM A.
I would suggest that most of Ray's discussion be gathered onto a web page
and pointed to from the journal article and that the journal article
be kept fairly short.
I think any of RSI, J. Appl. Cryst or NIM A would be appropriate, but
these days,
I think RSI and J. Appl. Cryst. will be seen by more people who would be new
to NeXus and HDF5 than the NIM A audience many of whom are already
fairly familiar with both.
  -- Herbert





On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Koennecke Mark (PSI)
<mark.koennecke at psi.ch> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I attach the two different versions of the NeXus paper. I also have a statement from RSI:
> they came up with the lame answer that they do not prejudge papers. So it is back to us
> to decide if we try RSI or reformat for Journal of Applied Crystallography right away.
>
>
> Regards,
>
>      Mark
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NeXus-committee mailing list
> NeXus-committee at nexusformat.org
> http://lists.nexusformat.org/mailman/listinfo/nexus-committee
>