[NeXus-committee] why cmake for building the manual?

[Eugen Wintersberger]

Ok - next try ;)
On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 08:36 -0600, Pete Jemian wrote: 
> The old build system worked for me on Windows.

:D
Maybe the intention was to have a single build system for all sources?

> 
> On 2/26/2015 8:35 AM, Eugen Wintersberger wrote:
> > I think the general reason why people want to use cmake is that it also
> > works on Windows ;).
> > Although I am not sure if this was the particular reason why we wanted
> > to build the documentation with cmake.
> >
> > Eugen
> >
> > On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 18:18 -0600, Pete Jemian wrote:
> >> slight rant here:
> >>
> >> What, again, was our motivation for using cmake to build the manual?
> >> Let's go back to the Makefile system.  It was not broken.
> >>
> >> see https://github.com/nexusformat/definitions/issues/391
> >>
> >> Pete
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> NeXus-committee mailing list
> >> NeXus-committee at nexusformat.org
> >> http://lists.nexusformat.org/mailman/listinfo/nexus-committee
> >

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.nexusformat.org/pipermail/nexus-committee/attachments/20150226/6f661ffe/attachment.sig>