[NeXus-committee] NXmonochromator for todays telecon

[Tobias Richter]

Hi,

My expectation was the NXcrystal would be a child of NXmonochromator as an element used to build the thing up. 
That view is supported by the current documentation as far as I can tell. In the last NIAC he approved NXgrating with the same rationale (with isn’t fully documented yet - it isn’t referenced anywhere).

So I would think that, as valid as they they have been at the time, the original intentions for NXcrystal are not binding. People independently worked out a different, but consistent and valid interpretation and we should honour that.

That’s a different solution to either of the ones in your document, correct Eugen?

Tobias


> On 18 Mar 2015, at 10:33, Eugen Wintersberger <eugen.wintersberger at desy.de> wrote:
> 
> Hi folks  
> as I was unabel to edit the wiki in finite time you will get my
> suggestions concerning NXmonochromator as an attachment to this mail. 
> I guess we should at least start a discussion about this today. 
> 
> regards
>  Eugen
> 
> PS: yes Pete, it was made with LaTeX (even the figures) ;)
> -- 
> ------------------------------------
> DI. Dr. Eugen Wintersberger         
> 
> FS-EC                              
> DESY                    
> Notkestrasse 85                       
> D-22607 Hamburg                    
> Germany                            
> 
> E-Mail: eugen.wintersberger at desy.de
> Telefon: +49-40-8998-1917          
> -----------------------------------
> <nxmonochromator.pdf>_______________________________________________
> NeXus-committee mailing list
> NeXus-committee at nexusformat.org
> http://lists.nexusformat.org/mailman/listinfo/nexus-committee