[NeXus-tech] Summary of last Telco

[Pete Jemian]

Can a different name be chosen for this concept?

Aside from the point noted below, the name requires much explanation to 
associate the name and the intent of this concept.  Something much more 
obvious should be chosen.

If it is used anywhere to determine position and orientation of a 
component, perhaps NXcomponent_axes is more to the point.

On 4/16/2014 6:50 AM, Mark Könnecke wrote:
> NXpoise
> =========
>
> NXpoise is a new group which has been suggested. It is a
> generalisation of NXgoniometer. As NXGoniometer, it is supposed to
> hold the axes needed to position the component and the depends_on
> field. NXpoise can occurr anywhere where it is required to be able to
> determine the position and orientation of a component precisely.
> NXpoise is required for the PX application definition to work. The
> consensus is that we use NXpoise for the time being and ratify it at
> the next NIAC meeting. There was a little discussion about NXpose
> versus NXpoise. Until the native speakers decided that NXpose is
> actually a common  typo of NXpoise.