[NeXus-tech] [NeXus-committee] NeXus paper V7

[Wintersberger, Eugen]

Just fixed my affiliation. 

I also added a .gitignore file which removes all temporary files from
gits supervision. I personally consider this useful - if you do not like
it please remove it again. 

regards
  Eugen

On Fri, 2014-08-15 at 15:42 +0000, Tobias.Richter at diamond.ac.uk wrote:
> What I liked about the debatable was the admission that NeXus
> standardises what people care about at the time. That may not turn out
> to be the best option in retrospect. Some decisions may even have to
> be reversed later.
> 
> But all you can do is make the best decision at the time. Hindsight
> isn’t readily available in bottles.
> 
>  
> 
> Just two comments while browsing the text (cannot rebuild it here at
> the moment anyway):
> 
>  
> 
> ·        The bottom of Fig. 1 appears to be cut off.
> 
> ·        How the text is organised in sections seems a bit arbitrary.
> There are two levels of subheadings in section III and none elsewhere.
> Section “NeXus Governance” could just move to the end of the
> Introduction, with “Backward Compatibility” moving just before that.
> 
>  
> 
> Regards,
> 
>  
> 
> Tobias
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> From: NeXus-tech [mailto:nexus-tech-bounces at nexusformat.org] On Behalf
> Of Mark Könnecke
> Sent: 15 August 2014 08:36
> To: NeXus Technical sub-committee list
> Subject: Re: [NeXus-tech] [NeXus-committee] NeXus paper V7
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> Pete,
> 
> we have crossed each other. I just have edited the additions made by
> Joachim and others a little. Most 
> of my changes just improve wording a little. 
> 
> But I removed the debatable from our decision on NXmonitors. I find
> the use of the word debatable 
> in a publication debatable.
> 
> I also removed the section on field ranks. If we adopt the interfaces
> proposal on the next NIAC, 
> we will be far more specific about ranks even in base classes. So, I
> opt for rather saying nothing 
> rather then something which may already be wrong by the time of
> publication.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>    Mark
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Am 15.08.2014 um 06:51 schrieb Pete R. Jemian <prjemian at gmail.com>:
> 
> > 
> > Just pushed changes to the draft to:
> > * convert the tables to PNG figures
> > * add design principles into the Design Principles section
> >  (We had words in that section but nothing that described the design
> principles as stated in the User Guide)
> > 
> > Look at the attached PDF
> > 
> > Pete
> > <nexus14aip.pdf>_______________________________________________
> > NeXus-committee mailing list
> > NeXus-committee at nexusformat.org
> > http://lists.nexusformat.org/mailman/listinfo/nexus-committee
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NeXus-tech mailing list
> NeXus-tech at nexusformat.org
> http://lists.nexusformat.org/mailman/listinfo/nexus-tech
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NeXus-tech mailing list
> NeXus-tech at nexusformat.org
> http://lists.nexusformat.org/mailman/listinfo/nexus-tech

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.nexusformat.org/mailman/private/nexus-tech/attachments/20140818/4fd938ee/attachment.sig>